HOW IT WORKS
What a full record looks like
Below is a live opportunity from the feed, shown exactly as a Pro user sees it, with every field annotated. Not a mockup; it re-renders from the database and rotates to a current record with a comfortable deadline.
Live record · shown unlocked · rotates with the feed
1Title and funder
Demonstration of solid biofuel supply and conversion to high efficiency CHP from fully sustainable regional value chains
2Summary
This Horizon Europe call funds demonstration projects converting sustainable regional solid biofuel supply chains into high-efficiency combined heat and power (CHP) systems. It targets consortia developing fully circular, regionally-integrated bioenergy value chains with awards up to €6.75M per project.
3Sector tags
RenewablesCircularInfrastructure
4Geography
EU
5Funding type · stage fit · organisation type
grant · prototype-pilot, scale-mature · large-company, sme, university, research-institution, consortium, engineering-contractor
6Key requirements
- Demonstration of solid biofuel supply chain from sustainable regional sources
- High-efficiency CHP conversion technology and deployment
- Full sustainability and circularity of the regional value chain
7Value and deadline
Up to €6.8M per project · closes 1 Dec 2026
8Relevance score
94 / 100
9Match score
Computed against your saved profile when you have one, out of 100: sector up to 50, geography up to 20, stage up to 15, organisation type up to 10, check size up to 5.
11Also published on
This record appears on one portal.
Field by field
- Title and funder. As published at source, translated to English if needed. The funder name links to their directory profile.
- Summary. Two sentences, plain English, produced at classification time. Written to answer "is this worth my click", nothing more.
- Sector tags. From a closed vocabulary, so filters behave predictably. How tagging works and where it errs: Accuracy and classification methodology.
- Geography. ISO country codes, resolved so text search on a country name matches records tagged with its code.
- Funding type, stage fit, organisation type. The three fields that kill bad matches fastest. Check these before reading anything else.
- Key requirements. One to three bullets extracted from the source: eligibility essentials, consortium rules, cost-share requirements.
- Value band and deadline. Normalised currency, ISO dates. Past-deadline records leave default views automatically.
- Relevance score. The 0 to 100 sustainability score. Default views hide sub-40 records.
- Match score. Your profile against this record on five checks (sector, geography, stage, organisation type, check size). Free accounts see the score; Pro adds the breakdown. Explainable by design.
- Source link. Every record carries one. Follow it; our classification either survives contact with the original or you should tell us.
- Also published on. Where the same notice appears on multiple portals, publications are collapsed into this one record with attribution.
What Free users see on this same record
Everything above except the match-score breakdown and, for teaser records, the funder identity. Same data quality, identity behind the paywall. The full split: What Free vs Pro actually unlocks.
Related
- What Free vs Pro actually unlocks
- Accuracy and classification methodology
- See records like this in context: A founder workflow